Projection and the Workplace Mirror: How Unconscious Dynamics Distort Team Functioning

Abstract
Projection is a psychological defense mechanism that allows individuals to externalize internal conflicts onto others. In organizational teams—particularly in high-stress, trauma-exposed systems—unconscious projection often drives conflict, distorts perception, and undermines psychological safety. This article provides a theoretical foundation for understanding projection in the workplace and analyzes how it manifests in team dynamics. Using the SWEET Healing Circle’s Four-Layer Model, we offer a structured framework for surfacing and transforming unconscious projection into self-awareness and relational accountability. Practical strategies for implementation are discussed, with implications for trauma-informed leadership and cultural transformation.

Keywords
Projection, unconscious dynamics, psychological defense mechanisms, trauma-informed systems, SWEET Healing Circle, SWEET Institute, team conflict, reflective practice, transference, displacement, organizational healing

Introduction
In many professional environments, team breakdowns are addressed superficially through communication training, performance management, or conflict resolution. While these strategies may yield short-term compliance, they often fail to address the deeper psychological dynamics fueling misunderstanding and dysfunction.

One such dynamic is projection—a mechanism that quietly, yet powerfully, distorts interpersonal relationships in the workplace. As Carl Jung (1954) noted, “Until you make the unconscious conscious, it will direct your life and you will call it fate.” When unconscious projections are left unexamined, teams suffer: relationships fracture, trust deteriorates, and leaders are misinterpreted or scapegoated. 

This article explores projection as a psychological process and practical challenge in organizational life. We examine its theoretical roots, observable patterns, and practical transformation through the SWEET Healing Circle for Teams.

Theoretical Framework
Origins of Projection - Projection was first defined by Freud (1936) as the externalization of unacceptable internal feelings or desires onto others. Anna Freud further elaborated on this in her defense mechanism theory, identifying projection as a primary ego defense under stress. Subsequent theorists, including Jung (1959), Kernberg (1975), and Vaillant (1992), positioned projection as an adaptive but often disruptive form of psychological protection.

In high-pressure or emotionally charged environments—such as human services, housing programs, crisis care, healthcare, management, or leadership—projection becomes more likely, particularly in individuals with unprocessed trauma or unresolved relational wounds (Cramer, 2000; van der Kolk, 2014).

Projection and Team Dynamics - In the workplace, projection often occurs without awareness and leads to distorted attributions of intent, motive, or character. Individuals may project fear, shame, control needs, or resentment onto peers, supervisors, or subordinates. These projections, when unaddressed, calcify into relational loops that impair collaboration and psychological safety (Edmondson, 1999).

Projection is commonly accompanied by other unconscious defenses:

• Transference: Reacting to present relationships based on prior attachments (Freud, 1905)

• Displacement: Redirecting emotion from the true source to a safer target (Luborsky, 1984)

Together, these processes transform teams into relational mirrors—where members are unknowingly interacting with the past, not the present.

Application and Analysis
Signs of Projection in Teams - Projection may present behaviorally as:

• Excessive judgment of a coworker’s “tone”

• Personalizing neutral feedback

• Labeling others as controlling, passive-aggressive, or incompetent

• Resistance to collaboration based on imagined motives

For example:

• A staff member with unresolved fear of abandonment may perceive a supervisor’s direct communication as “harsh” or “punitive”

• A team lead struggling with imposter syndrome may interpret silence in a meeting as rejection

These distortions are not the result of malice or incompetence—they are emotional echoes operating beneath conscious awareness.

The SWEET Healing Circle Framework - The SWEET Healing Circle for Teams provides a structured, psychologically safe process for surfacing unconscious projection through its Four-Layer Model:

1. Conscious Layer – External behavior: what was said, done, or not done

2. Pre-Conscious Layer – Internal beliefs and schemas (e.g., “I’m not safe when I speak up”)

3. Unconscious Layer – Symbolic re-enactments and projection

4. Existential Layer – Choice, values, and ownership

Facilitated Circle sessions guide staff through structured inquiry such as:

• “What was activated in me?”

• “What memory or belief might this remind me of?”

• “What am I assuming—and what might be an alternate explanation?”

This process disrupts projection and supports integration of past and present, fostering self-awareness and collective insight.

Implications for Organizations - Unexamined projection in the workplace can lead to:

• Fractured teams

• Supervisor burnout due to repeated misinterpretation

• Erosion of psychological safety

• Increased staff turnover and moral injury

By contrast, organizations that normalize emotional reflection and build shared vocabulary around unconscious processes develop:

• Stronger communication grounded in curiosity

• More resilient conflict recovery

• Accountability based on relationship, not surveillance

• Cultures of learning instead of blame

Trauma-informed leadership must include training in emotional defense awareness—not to pathologize staff, but to illuminate how human minds under pressure interact with human systems under strain (Brown, 2018; Siegel, 2010).

Conclusion
Projection is not pathological. It is protective.

But when it remains unnamed, it distorts perception, damages relationships, and derails team collaboration. By supporting staff to “see the mirror,” the SWEET Healing Circle helps organizations cultivate responsibility, alignment, and trust.

When projection is transformed from reactivity into reflection, the result is more than clarity—it is culture change. 

References

• Brown, B. (2018). Dare to Lead: Brave Work. Tough Conversations. Whole Hearts. Random House.

• Cramer, P. (2000). Defense mechanisms in psychology today: Further processes for adaptation. American Psychologist, 55(6), 637–646.

• Edmondson, A. C. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383.

• Freud, A. (1936). The Ego and the Mechanisms of Defence. International Universities Press.

• Freud, S. (1905). Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality.

• Jung, C. G. (1954). The Development of Personality. Princeton University Press.

• Jung, C. G. (1959). The Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious. Princeton University Press.

• Kernberg, O. F. (1975). Borderline Conditions and Pathological Narcissism. Jason Aronson.

• Luborsky, L. (1984). Principles of Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy: A Manual for Supportive-Expressive Treatment. Basic Books.

• Siegel, D. J. (2010). Mindsight: The New Science of Personal Transformation. Bantam.

• Vaillant, G. E. (1992). Ego Mechanisms of Defense: A Guide for Clinicians and Researchers. American Psychiatric Pub.

• van der Kolk, B. A. (2014). The Body Keeps the Score: Brain, Mind, and Body in the Healing of Trauma. Viking.

Download the scholarly version of this article by clicking HERE